Empathy and Sincerity
Last week I was in a meeting about a topic on which I am relatively inexpert. As a student for life, this was an exciting opportunity for me to get smart in an area that was very intriguing. As a naïve observer, I also had the unique opportunity to bring a fresh perspective. We all tend to see things a very specific way when immersed in a subject matter and it's never a bad idea to have an outsider challenge orthodoxy. Very early on in the meeting, my emotions got the better of me when I caught two experts exchanging glances and rolling their eyes. From a personal perspective, it irritated me. On behalf of my team (also naïve to the topic), I felt protective. It later struck me that I was experiencing the unique opportunity of sitting in my clients' shoes. As consultants, it's implicit in our mandate to exude expertise and wisdom. It's very easy to fall down the slippery slope of pedagogy, arrogance, and dismissal of customers as "ill-informed". I've done it more times than I care to admit.
On a half dozen occasions, I've had the professional development conversation related to pointed client feedback. Typically, it revolves around clients perceiving us as arrogant, condescending, or argumentative. The feedback often elicits questions related to expression. "How can I change my wording?" "How can I soften my tone." I think these are the wrong questions. The right question is "How can I change how I feel?" If you feel arrogant and condescending, no amount of effort spent on altering expression (verbal, tonality, body language) is going to prevent your client from realizing this. I think the best questions are "why do I feel superior?", "what can we learn from our client?", and "how can we take advantage of our client's fresh perspective." The intent is not to make your client feel better or differently, but to truly appreciate and prize his/her perspective.

1 Comments:
I, too, am a committed student. I could imagine myself getting irritated when someone does what I would call “condescending”. And find myself being defensive. And in fact I have done this and might also find myself doing in the future. Now, why do I get irritated in the first place? Could it be my own discomfort with not “knowing” (being naive as you put it)? Why is it not ok to be naïve? To not know? To not get it fast? To be confused? Maybe a good look at some of my deeply ingrained and integrated believes in this area might help free me from their hold. And a slow motion look at what might be going on might prove useful??
Could it be that my own discomfort and low tolerance for naivety “is condescending me/placing me below the speaker”? Could it be possible that I then project this on to the speaker and feel intimated/condescended? Furthermore, could it be that not wanting to feel that, I then move quickly to get to a higher place than the speaker by bringing in (through asking questions) my own field of authority where I most likely have more knowledge (which might be what you call “fresh perspective”)? Or maybe I just try to challenge the speaker by not respecting their knowledge and experience (which might be what you call “to have an outsider challenge orthodoxy”)? And when the speaker feels condescended by my arrogance and hostility and roll their eyes, I take it as proof that they are arrogant. I take their obvious expression of frustration with a “Know-it-All” that I know myself to be and proceed to get self-righteous and act irritated and defensive. Of course, if I was the speaker (this too has happened to me) I would question the beliefs that make me get frustrated and bring me to rolling my eyes. Thanks to rolling eyes, irritation and defensivness we can have a honest communication.
Thank you for providing a platform where I can look at myself (through you). I am humbled arrogantly.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home